About the Initiative

About NFPA

Free Access

  • Free Access


  • The views expressed on this blog reflect the personal opinion of the individual author and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of NFPA, its technical committees, or other constituent parts. Use of this blog is subject to NFPA's Terms of Use and Content Disclaimers.

« Two children die, babysitter injured in duplex fire: Fire sprinklers could have made a difference | Main | Fire destroys WV model home: Sprinklers may have made a difference »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

why dont you post the research paper done by the Fire Protection Research Foundation in support of the NFPA (National Fire Protection Agency). It was specifically written for what community impacts would be in reference to sprinklers and water flow.

In it you can point out two important statistics:
1. The odds of a single family home having a fire is .34% (less than ½ of 1%) (page 37)and 2. The average number of years before a home has a fire is 288 years. (page 38)

If you wish to down load the research in its entirety go to the following web site.


Mr. Robertson:

As a point of clarification, you should know that we are the National Fire Protection Association, not Agency.

It is not unusual for fire sprinkler opponents to misrepresent NFPA statistics, or to cite them out of context to justify their opposition. I am not a statistician and to properly answer your comment I counted on the expertise of Dr. John Hall, NFPA's Director of Fire Analysis and Research. His comments follow:

"0.34% is the likelihood of having a fire in a single-family home in one year. You will be living in a single-family home for more than 50 years. In that time, your chances of having a fire will rise to about 50 x 0.34% = 17% or about one in six. Same odds you get playing Russian roulette. Are the odds for Russian roulette acceptably low? I would say no and I suspect everyone reading this would, too."

"The same number can seem very high or very low, based solely on how it is stated and what context is provided. The number you provided is designed to sound low and with no context, it does sound low. Provide the context and it doesn’t seem low at all."

"Are we safe enough from fires that we don’t need to do anything else to be safer? Most people would say no. If they say no, they’d like to know about sprinklers, a practical, affordable technology that will lower all your fire-related risks by much more than anything else out there. The FSI blog is here for those people."

The Fire Protection Research Foundation report is prominently posted on the NFPA website and a blog post appeared here early last month: http://nfpa.typepad.com/firesprinklerinitiative/2012/10/fire-sprinklered-buildings-vs-unsprinklered-buildings-what-is-the-impact-on-community-water-consumpt.html

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Enter your email address to receive timely updates to this blog:

Delivered by FeedBurner