About the Initiative

About NFPA

Free Access

  • Free Access


  • The views expressed on this blog reflect the personal opinion of the individual author and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of NFPA, its technical committees, or other constituent parts. Use of this blog is subject to NFPA's Terms of Use and Content Disclaimers.

« Impacting perception of fire risk at the community level | Main | NFPA expert talks about requirements and alternatives for antifreeze solutions in fire sprinkler systems »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Firefighters are too often hurt or killed while battling a blaze in a one and two family structure. Unlike commercial buildings, the contents in private residences are close to 100% combustible, including the residence itself. Then add the potential of life inside needing help, including children and you can understand why statistics show that home is where the firefighter is at most risk.
Installation of a quick response sprinkler system would reduce such stats dramatically. States, cities, townships should develop a program where a homeowner is awarded for retrofitting a sprinkler system into their castle. Such a program would ultimately save money for everyone from the costs of treating the injured; firefighters and homeowners alike.

Does the data supports or shows if there is a direct correlation between the reductions of fire fighter injuries in sprinklered structures versus unsprinklered structures? It appears that occupancies that are more likely to be sprinklered, such as public assemblies, show a higher percentage of fire fighter injuries than the single family dwellings which are less likely to be sprinklered.

Has there been a study on the reduction of asbestos exposure through fire sprinkler suppression? When dormant those toxic fibers don't cause much damage, but it seems obvious that firefighters would have increased exposure during a heavy structure fire. Modern sprinkler installations could reduce those long-term, environmental health risks.

I am a little confused because in reading the FEMA report for 2011 dated July 2012, firefighter fatalities I see that over 60% of deaths were from stress or over exertion.
MY recommendation....
Take the money that would be spent on sprinklers and hire more fire fighters.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Enter your email address to receive timely updates to this blog:

Delivered by FeedBurner