About the Initiative

About NFPA

Free Access

  • Free Access


  • The views expressed on this blog reflect the personal opinion of the individual author and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of NFPA, its technical committees, or other constituent parts. Use of this blog is subject to NFPA's Terms of Use and Content Disclaimers.

« Home fire sprinklers requirements in California yield no negative impact on construction | Main | Amy Acton on burn survivors: From tragedy to advocacy »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thank You!
The Sullivan tragedy, however shocking, has had many other names in the past year. Yet statewide and locally, those folks also have not created an urgency to change among people that knew them.
Tragedy is something experienced only by the living members associated with the person. We protect our homes with fire sprinklers and bend under the pressure against saying "no" when our children want to sleep over somewhere less safe. Sometimes, our children sleep over somewhere that smoke alarms aren't present, or if they are, they don't work. There is little difference from that and the eight smoke alarms installed in the home. They didn't save a thing.The fire department left a pile of demolished home that had to be removed to return to an empty lot to maintain an aesthetic neighborhood. Smoke alarms don't save lives. Smoke alarms sound a warning to take action in the form of an escape plan-something 87% of the students in Redford Union Elementary schools reported failure of doing when surveyed. That said, residential fire sprinklers have, and will continue, to save lives of people with smoke alarms and no plans or practice because it gives them time to figure out what they were supposed to figure out and practice before the fire occurred. Most often, the Sullivans wouldnt even have had to relocate while repairs occurred. I think the code requirement for smoke alarms in every room, that was once a smoke alarm on every level provides a false sense of safety, because in this story's end, even a smoke alarm in every room did not allow a police officer's family enough time to escape safely to tell their story of horror. I regret the Sullivan's choice, as much as the son will live knowing there was something that would have changed the outcome. Perhaps an attendee said it best when asked if he knew about fire sprinklers in the home as he walked slowly with a cane in hand. "I am not a proponent of safety requirements for people from cradle to grave". He made his choice, knowing that someone else is expected to intervene and he didn't care. I greive with the Sullivans and all those who have succombed to such folly, and proclaim that residential fire sprinklers make a proven difference! We cant stop advocating for code change because folly doesn't just injure and kill the people who just won't choose for their own safety.
Leslie L. Wedge, Fire Chief (retired)
Redford Twp. Fire Department

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Enter your email address to receive timely updates to this blog:

Delivered by FeedBurner