About the Initiative

About NFPA

  • NFPAThe mission of the international nonprofit NFPA, established in 1896, is to reduce the worldwide burden of fire and other hazards on the quality of life by providing and advocating consensus codes and standards, research, training, and education.

Free Access

  • Free Access

NFPA membership

  • NFPA membership


  • The views expressed on this blog reflect the personal opinion of the individual author and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of NFPA, its technical committees, or other constituent parts. Use of this blog is subject to NFPA's Terms of Use and Content Disclaimers.

« High risk homes to get fire sprinklers in Essex, England | Main | Guest blogger Cecil Bilbo on the importance of NFPA 13D »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Yea I wish the FSS that I am required to have installed cost $3,000. My house is only going to be 1148 sq. ft. The cost of my FSS is $5650 plus $625 for a special valve required by the fire dept. Total $6275. I keep reading that the average cost is suppose to be $1.35 a sq. ft. What's wrong with this picture. If this is a state law, then why isn't it being implimented everywhere and not just here and there at fire departments whimsy.

Ms. Banthrall,
There are many variables that can impact system cost. Sometimes authorities ask for more than is required in the standard. We conduct numerous outreach activities trying to educate policy makers to avoid unnecessary requirements. I am guessing that the special valve required for your system is a backflow prevention device. The requirement of this device also triggers a yearly inspection by qualified persons. Multipurpose systems that are incorporated into the home's plumbing system do not require this type of valve. Stand alone or antifreeze systems do. Still $5.46 per square feet is way above the prices we found in the communities and the systems studied, revealing an average cost of $1.35.

You state that you "conduct numerous outreach activities trying to educate policy makers to avoid unnecessary requirements." How effective have those efforts been? In Minnesota, the proposal to adopt sprinklers in residences includes requirements for sprinklers in garages and at covered porches, decks, and patios. Have you contacted anyone in Minnesota to inquire why costs are being unnecessarily increased with these additional requirements that are occurring with no justification?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner